If he was on the same tier as the original X he would have managed to be of some challenge to Zero. Zero outright says "his body" remembers X was a lot stronger than Copy who he considered a weakling. I wouldn't say Copy X was quite the same as X. Zero was a much better fighter than X at the beginning (it's kind of a plot point in X1), X eventually caught up with his own fights and they became equals. However, you missed my point: What I was saying is that they were even in that regard in different ways.
Megaman x5 x vs zero series#
didn't X defeat Omega along with Zero? Also, Zero, from what I get has become considerably stronger in the Zero Series compared to his X incarnation, hasn't he? Reason why he could take down Omega on his own disagree regarding experience, it's quite important and even decisive in cases where other factors are even. So even their score is all over the place. Also, in X2, X can fight a controlled Zero and win, being in good enough shape to defeat Sigma afterwards. While Zero is in good enough shape to get up in two of them, in the one where he's empowered by the Maverick Virus (and according to the game stronger than ever), he can only muster the strength to jump in the way and save X. In scenarios where they fight they both end on the floor. From what I get they are both pretty much even in other categories, around the same level of experience (Zero has a bit more or prior experience, but X has more fights against Sigma's schemes and his mavericks), skill (each outmatches the other in a different regard, Zero is better at CQC, X at ranged combat, but both are skilled in their not specialties) and phyisical capabilities (and with speed equalized Zero's edge in that category is gone). I think I'll go with X due to a larger amount of weapons and versatility (mostly from his solo X games and more options with the armors). I agree with Z era Zero being stronger, however this battle is using X era Zero. He's more stoic than even X as a general rule, and the gap between their close quarters combat is greater than the gap between their ranged combat Going with Zero for a very slight margin though. I think both are relatively equal, but Zero's got infinite ammo for most of his techniques unless this is composite X, in which case it's a mostly moot point. I think the deciding factor will be stamina. Zero has like maybe a months more experience or so in battle than X, not really a meaningful difference when both are centuries old. Neither one outclasses the other very badly despite incremental edges. Zero on the other hand, is faster in any game than X. X is also physically tougher than Zero despite the fact that both can withstand grievous injuries. On the other hand though, Zero has the edge in close quarters combat and can absorb energy with his saber, meaning he could get close up and go to town. While both have comparable range, X is a better marksman. X likely has a slight versatility edge over Zero due to having more weapons despite Zero having a technique advantage. Both resist all the hax the other has, so this is gonna come from other attributes.
0 kommentar(er)
